Information Regarding Denver D.A. Mitchell Morrissey

and Additional Information

Sean's Main Page

 

Mitchell Morrissey

Denver District Attorney

The person who can't prosecute Carol Isbell for crimes committed UNTIL someone tells him she committed crimes, even though all the evidence has been presented. (?)

 

Gov. Bill Ritter

The Person in the D.A.'s Office when all this took place against Sean.  Now, he says he doesn't have any jurisdiction. (?) 

 

"This is Taken Directly off of the Denver DA Website"


The Economic Crime Unit primarily prosecutes financial crimes such as theft, forgery, fraud and credit card fraud. The Economic Crime Unit in the Denver DA's Office staffs its own intake section to field complaints and allegations, receiving an incredible 10,000 calls a year!
Many inquiries turn out to be civil matters rather than criminal matters. Civil matters are referred elsewhere for resolution. Criminal matters are investigated by a team of skilled investigators who prepare cases for prosecution by deputies of the Economic Crime Unit. They aggressively pursue criminals suspected of financial crimes and have an excellent track record for seeking restitution when possible.
It is far easier to prevent economic crime than it is to prosecute it and secure restitution, and most victims will never fully recover all that they have lost. For this reason, the Economic Crime Unit also focuses on Crime Prevention, providing safety information and extensive community outreach.
Protect yourself! Learn all that you can on the ways to prevent these types of crimes: Consumer Alerts

 

Man loses bid to gain freedom by legislation
Panel guts part of bill intended to help inmate
By Katie Kerwin McCrimmon, Rocky Mountain News
Friday, May 2, 2008


A Denver man who has spent 20 years in prison for a rape that he says he did not commit will receive no help from the Colorado legislature after Denver police destroyed DNA evidence in his case.
On Friday, a House-Senate Conference Committee gutted the part of Senate Bill 205 that would have helped Clarence Moses-El, the man for whom Senate Majority Leader Ken Gordon had shepherded the legislation.
Moses-El was convicted in a 1987 rape in Denver's Five Points neighborhood, even though there was little physical evidence. Prosecutors say that the woman identified Moses-El, her neighbor at the time, after seeing his face three times during the attack.


Defense attorneys said that the woman named three other suspects, including one convicted rapist, before dreaming two days after the attack that Moses-El was her attacker.


Denver District Attorney Mitch Morrissey has studied the trial transcripts, interviewed the lawyers and spoken with the victim. He is so convinced that the right man is behind bars that he lobbied lawmakers to kill the Senate version. 
(Take in mind, Mitchell Morrissey has stated to be an advocate of DNA testing, but he makes this statement without testing the DNA he had available to him.  Statements like this should be based on FACT, not assumption.)


Lawyers in his office also wrote the final version of the bill that the House approved after Gov. Bill Ritter threatened a veto of Sen. Gordon's version of the bill. Morrissey showed lawmakers Moses-El's lengthy rap sheet, along with transcripts from the trial, to convince them not to support Gordon, a Denver Democrat and former defense attorney.


"I'm glad to see that the House finally realized that Moses-El is not the kind of criminal you should go to bat for. The legislature should not be in the business of changing legal decisions they don't like," Morrissey said. "We went around (the state Capitol) handing out actual pieces of the trial transcript. Moses-El is a rightfully-convicted brutal rapist."
(Maybe he should have made this statement AFTER it was confirmed by DNA testing.  And what is this?  He has time to pass out actual pieces of trial transcripts, but he doesn't have time to do an adequate investigation of blatant evidence that a crime has been committed - oh, and actually has to be told by federal officials that a crime has been committed?  What law school did this guy attend?)


Moses-El's lawyer, Trip DeMuth, said that his client has suffered injustice upon injustice.
"First you have a victim who identifies other suspects, then the dream, then . . they throw the DNA in the trash.
(WHAT??  Could it have proved that this man did not commit this crime?)  Good government bears some responsibility for its own misdeeds," DeMuth said. "They've been able to preserve his rap sheet, but they destroyed the DNA." (After what has happened with Sean's case, this does not surprise us.)


In 1995, Moses-El won a court order requiring a DNA test, only to find that police had destroyed the DNA gathered in the investigation.  (Again, this doesn't surprise us either.)

Taken straight from the Denver D.A. Office website:

"About Us

The Denver District Attorney's Office is the chief law enforcement/prosecuting office in the Second Judicial District of Colorado. Led by District Attorney Mitchell R. Morrissey,
the Denver District Attorney's Office is responsible for prosecuting all felonies, misdemeanors and serious traffic offenses committed in Denver. The Denver District Attorney also provides assistance to victims and witnesses of crime.


MISSION

The mission of the Denver District Attorney's Office is to professionally and competently prosecute crimes and investigate potential crimes on behalf of the people of the State of Colorado and, in doing so, do justice, advocate victim's rights, and advise and consult in the deterrence and prevention of crime. Denver District Attorney Mitchell R. Morrissey and his staff work to ensure the open, even-handed and humane administration of justice."

Mitch Morrissey's (Denver D.A.) Oath to Office

Oath to Office Bond

We have a quiz question for all that are following this case.  How many laws can you break in Colorado before the Denver D.A.'s office will file charges? (without having to tell the D.A. that the law has actually been broken)

 

Now, with all that being said, why, with all the evidence, that the blatant crimes that have been committed are being ignored?  If I read this right, Mitchell Morrissey CLEARLY STATES "responsible for prosecuting all felonies, misdemeanors and serious traffic offenses committed in Denver" 

I would think that if someone took the time to write out the "About Us" and "Mission" statement, that they would at least adhere to what they say they are going to do.

"I swore an oath when I took this office to uphold the law and the constitution of the state of Colorado."

(from Frontline interview with Mitch Morrissey Nov. 28, 2006)

 

An email was written to Mr. Morrissey, Denver D.A., to reopen this case, and these letters and documents were attached.

Subject:
AO Confidential - Right a Wrong
From:
alenorman@americaswrongfullyconvicted.com )  
Date: Tue, Mar 04, 2008 1:11 pm
To: mrm@denverda.org
Cc: byw@denverda.org, roger@americaswrongfullyconvicted.com
Bcc:  
Subject:
AO Confidential - Right a Wrong
From:
alenorman@americaswrongfullyconvicted.com )  
Date: Tue, Mar 04, 2008 1:11 pm
To: mrm@denverda.org
Cc: byw@denverda.org, roger@americaswrongfullyconvicted.com
Bcc:  
Dear Mr. Morrissey,
I believe, that when there is a problem, instead of beating around the bush, get straight to the point.  And, not only that, I believe that if you can not get the results that you need from people involved, that you go to their superiors, which leads me to you.
We have had a young man approach us regarding an issue that was handled out of your office by Joe Morales, who heads your Economic Crime Unit.  After speaking with this young man, we decided to assist him in proving his innocence.  We have reviewed all the documents, and even had a handwriting analyst determine that the signatures on the documents used as evidence against him, were not his, but in fact, his mother's and grandfather's.
This young man is only 23 years old.  He pled guilty to the offense of theft from an at risk adult, but only because he was informed he was facing 32 years in prison.  Due to the lack of wisdom of youth and finances to afford an attorney, he pled out.
If Joe Morales would have investigated further, he would have found that first, the checks and promissory note, used to take money from a trust fund, was not his, but that of his mother and grandfather.  We are in possession of those documents.  Also, we had a handwriting analyst make the same determination.  My first question would be is how did Mr. Morales arrive at his conclusion?  Mr. Isbell informed us that he spoke with Mr. Morales, attempting to get him to reopen the case, and he refused, stating that he would not prosecute her because of her being such a thoughtful, caring mother. (?)  No mother, or grandfather, does this to their child.
I have read a lot about you and the DNA program that you are involved in.  Handwriting is considered a form of forensic science, and I believe that the attached will stand up in court.  If you are so aggressive in exonerating innocent people, then, with all the evidence, you should consider reopening this case and investigate this man's mother and grandfather, and get this young man exonerated and make the guilty pay restitution to this young man.  All the documents, and story, are at www.americaswrongfullyconvicted.com/sean_isbell.htm.
To give you some information, this has all been reported to officials that govern banks and securities, case numbers have already been assigned and an investigation has begun.  If, Mr. Morales would have been willing to listen to the young man, it would have been easy to determine that this young man did not commit the crime, but his mother and grandfather, that they used him as a tax shelter until it was no longer feasible.
Sean Isbell has given his permission for me to speak with you regarding this case.  If you need a signed letter stating such, I will be more than happy to get that to you.
Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.  I am looking forward to working with you and clearing up this unfortunate incident.
Sincerely,
Anita LeNorman
Assistant Director

 

 

From: alenorman@americaswrongfullyconvicted.com [mailto:alenorman@americaswrongfullyconvicted.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:22 PM
To: Mitch Morrissey
Cc: Brenda Wellington;
roger@americaswrongfullyconvicted.com
Subject: [FWD: Confidential - Right a Wrong] - Second Request

 

Dear Mr. Morrissey,

I have spoken with Sean Isbell and he has inquired if you have responded to the email that was sent to you on March 4, 2008.

The FINRA has written to Sean, stating that Wachovia is demanded to turn over any/all information, transactions, checks (front & back) no later than April 4, 2008, which he can turn over copies to you that reflects what was told in the previous email.

Please review the documents at www.americaswrongfullyconvicted.com/sean_isbell.htm.

We would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

Anita LeNorman

Assistant Director

 

Subject:
R RE: [FWD: Confidential - Right a Wrong] - Second Request
From:
"Mitch Morrissey" <Mrm@denverda.org>
Date: Wed, Mar 12, 2008 12:59 pm
To: <alenorman@americaswrongfullyconvicted.com>
Cc: "Brenda Wellington" <Byw@denverda.org>

Ms LeNorman:

I am presently looking into this matter and it would be helpful to know the agency that governs banks and securities to which this has been reported.  It would also be of great assistance to me to know the names and contact information of the officials who are investigating this matter. Please forward this information to me so I can further my inquiry into this situation.

Sincerely,

Mitch Morrissey

Denver District Attorney

 

 

From:
alenorman@americaswrongfullyconvicted.com )  
Date: Wed, Mar 26, 2008 1:19 pm
To: Mitch Morrissey <Mrm@denverda.org>
Cc: roger@americaswrongfullyconvicted.com
Dear Mr. Morrissey,
I have spoken with, and filed a complaint, to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.  They advised, that since the FINRA had already been notified, that they will allow FINRA to continue their investigation before they actually "step in".  They stated that if Wachovia Securities does not comply with the FINRA that they then can take over, but want to give the FINRA a chance to reconcile this matter.  They also advised me to inform you to work with the FINRA in their investigation in the meantime in order to expedite the matter.  Sean Isbell will also have the right to arbitration through the FINRA, which is not an afforded luxury with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, that the USSEC assists the FINRA in forcing Wachovia to comply.
At this time, we do not have a persons name, but ask that you get with the FINRA person (information sent to you in previous email) to assist in your investigation. 
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Anita LeNorman
Assistant Director

 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [FWD: RE: Sean Isbell]
From: "Mitch Morrissey" <
Mrm@denverda.org>
Date: Wed, April 09, 2008 5:36 pm
To: <
alenorman@americaswrongfullyconvicted.com>

Ms LeNorman:
 
In your original e-mail, dated March 04, 2008, you indicated that the situation involving Mr. Isbell’s mother “has all been reported to officials that govern banks and securities, case numbers have already been assigned and an investigation has begun.” You later indicated in other e-mails that “federal officials”, “officials from Wachovia Securities”, “officials from the FINRA” were all investigating the situation surrounding Mr. Isbell’s mother. In early March, I asked you to send me the names of the federal officials investigating the Isbell matter and you have never provided me with that information.
 
You now agree that nothing done by his mother relieves Mr. Isbell of his criminal behavior in the case brought by my office. The information regarding Mr. Isbell’s mother deals with issues that according to you are under investigation by other entities responsible for such investigations. My office will be more than happy to assist those agencies in their work if and when they contact us.
 
Again as far as I am concerned the matter regarding Mr. Isbell is close.
 
Mitch Morrissey
Denver District Attorney

 

From:
alenorman@americaswrongfullyconvicted.com )  
Date: Wed, Apr 09, 2008 8:16 pm
To: Mitch Morrissey <Mrm@denverda.org>
Mr. Morrissey,
On 3/20/08, you wrote me an email regarding information.  I responded the same day at 10:28am that I was out of touch due to computer problems.  I asked if you had received the information on the Wachovia attorney I sent you, and since I did not hear back from you, I forwarded you a copy on 3/20/08 at 1:07pm of the correspondence to sent to Wachovia on 3/12/08 at 5:11pm.  This had the contact information in the email.  On 3/20/08, there was another complaint filed with the Internal Revenue Service regarding funds that Carol Isbell received, but transferred the liability to Sean Isbell.  I have not received the case number back on that filing, but have been informed that I should receive soon.  On the email sent to you on 03/20/08 at 2:20pm, I sent you the contact information to the FINRA.  The SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) complaint was refiled on 03/26/08 and we have been informed that if satisfaction is not received through the FINRA, that they would step in.  This is pending until we receive the letter from the FINRA.  I notified you of this on 3/26/08 at 1:19pm.  On 3/31/08 at 5:21pm, I informed you that the records have been requested (again) from Wachovia by Mr. Riley and that the FINRA had given Wachovia until 4/4/08 to respond.  To date, they have not responded.  This information will be forwarded to the SEC for them to contact the FINRA regarding compliance. 
Immediately after sending this email to you, I will be forwarding the Colorado Uniform Transfer to Minors Act to the FINRA.  (attached) of the alleged violations by Carol Isbell.  It clearly states in 11-50-103 that this Act is "enforceable in this state" (referring to Colorado).  It also states in 11-50-113 that the custodian shall keep custodial property separate and distinct from all other property in a manner to sufficient to identify it clearly as custodial property of the minor, and also that the custodian shall keep records of all transactions with respect to custodial property and SHALL make them available for inspection at reasonable intervals by the minor if the minor has attained he age of fourteen years. (which she has not managed to do)
The UTMA 11-50-121 states that the custodian SHALL transfer in an appropriate manner the custodial property to the minor or to the minor's estate upon the earlier of:  (a) the minor's attainment of twenty-one years of age (21).
This is important because the custodial account, and all funds on Mr. Isbell's birthday of 6/29/05 were LEGALLY his and his mother and grandfather removed $11,790 from the account and cashed the check in 7/05. Which is the (S1) exhibit on the website at www.americaswrongfullconvicted.com/sean_isbell.htm.
Now, other than the fact that it has been proven that she forged Mr. Isbell's name (by the certified document examiner) and that it is shown that she has violated the UTMA, how much more proof is needed to show that these people committed crimes and have not been adequately investigated?
The phrase you used "You now agree that nothing done by his mother relieves Mr. Isbell of his criminal behavior in the case brought by my office."  I did not say I agreed that nothing done by his mother relieves Mr. Isbell, I stated that I was fully aware that nothing will be done regarding his conviction, and that I did not understand you "closing the matter" on his mother's crime.  Two different things.
I'm not trying to be difficult, but I feel that all the evidence is blatant that she committed the crime of identity theft and forgery and it is being ignored.  I personally, have put a lot of hours into "investigating" this matter and getting the evidence and most investigators or detectives would love to have this kind of evidence.  I am hoping that you will work with me on this because something tells me, after all I've read, that you don't like dishonesty or crime and that you could not possibly, in your heart, let something like this just walk because of personal feelings you have with Mr. Isbell, but because what these people (his mother and grandfather) is an atrocity.  This issue is not about "Mr. Isbell" but Carol Isbell and Theodore Silverman.
God bless you and your family.
Anita LeNorman
Assistant Director